Hacking bans should be equal with macro bans

[Babysoy]

If you actually think about it, hacking outside of conquest is not a perma ban while macroing is a perma ban in and outside of conquest. I think the bans of macro shouldn't be perma, because the cheats like hitbox, reach give you a big advantage compared to macros and the ban of macro is bigger than the ban of hacking. I just want to see the opinion of other players


ty for ur time

ps: I'm not making this to get anyone unbanned just to make it fair enough.

 

[Obstinance]

macro basically auto pot

 

[Babysoy]

macro basically auto pot

Basically, it's just not

 

[czmpos]

I think the Macro ban shouldn't be permaban but the cheating bans should be permanent, inside and outside conquest,
Maybe the first Macro offense 30d and the second Macro offense permanent.

edit: if this is applied players who are currently banned for macroing shouldn't be unbanned, I think they must appeal their ban the same as a normal ban.

 

[Skuhoo]

Macroing and hacking is treated the same with regards to punishments. If someone who is banned for hacking receives a different ban length than someone banned for macroing it'll be because of reasons like where it occurred, how long it had been happening, and past history.

 

[Babysoy]

Macroing and hacking is treated the same with regards to punishments. If someone who is banned for hacking receives a different ban length than someone banned for macroing it'll be because of reasons like where it occurred, how long it had been happening, and past history.

Ty just needed to know, and also i was wondering if someone cheated in the ranked season would he be banned from the ranked season after his ban is over?

 

[PlayboiCamel]

Ty just needed to know, and also i was wondering if someone cheated in the ranked season would he be banned from the ranked season after his ban is over?

i think thats a pretty good idea tbf