No Plans to Implement Make it so unstable items cant be burn

[98d_]

Right now when u go to a RI and kill some1, 99% of the time they die on the lava and all their stuff and ores mined get burned.
My suggestion is that the unstable items cant be burn so at least when you kill some1 at least u get the ores

 

[Zachary_N_Kaleno]

Don't kill people next to lava?

 

[arnqu]

+1 i hate when the people run to lava and lose all items (but just don't burn the minerals)

 

[Scotlxnd]

Don't kill people next to lava?

Kinda hard when they most of the time pearl into the lava or try to hide in it, also 80% of ris are lava.

 

[Lurnn]

game is game

 

[daqniel]

+1 gotta make money from the ri hunting

 

[Cryptite]

Don't kill people next to lava?

game is game

 

[Obstinance]

all eyes on me and imma send it up to PAC

 

[Obstinance]

Make it so a random 50% of unstable items from kills in red tag besides gank isle will be sent directly to escrow

 

[Zachary_N_Kaleno]

Kinda hard when they most of the time pearl into the lava or try to hide in it, also 80% of ris are lava.

Then that's a fair strategy of war. Let them.

Sometimes it's not about winning, it's about making sure your opponent doesn't benefit.

"We should remove lockable doors because my enemy can hide behind it in their town!"

"Kinda hard when they most of the time pearl behind a door in their town, or try to hide in glass, also 80% of the town is doors!"

 

[koi0001]

Kinda hard when they most of the time pearl into the lava or try to hide in it, also 80% of ris are lava.

Well we're totally fine with this. I don't think we need to incentivize RI ganks more as the risk to reward ratio for gankers is already extremely high.

Not to mention it's not as if Loka has a resource scarcity issue.

 

[Melon]

Well we're totally fine with this. I don't think we need to incentivize RI ganks more as the risk to reward ratio for gankers is already extremely high.

Not to mention it's not as if Loka has a resource scarcity issue.

True, but there’s also already 0 risk to go there and mine free money.

 

[Cryptite]

True, but there’s also already 0 risk to go there and mine free money.

So does that mean the OP is asking for negative risk to go there and mine free money?

Tell that to the fallen of the RIs

 

[mindblaster007]

-1 it’s the only thing that lets me stop hackers from getting my ores at RIs.

+1 when Guardians do their jobs and ban hackers.

 

[Obstinance]

-1 it’s the only thing that lets me stop hackers from getting my ores at RIs.

+1 when Guardians do their jobs and ban hackers.

did you ever consider that you're god awful at the game regardless of who is cheating?

 

[Melon]

Idk, RI ganks were only really a thing before instanced RIs just cause everyone would be competing for the same materials at the same time. Making this change might add some risk to having to go to an RI, maybe at least make it more difficult, as there will be more people there if you are able to gank for a profit.

 

[Blissterz]

Then that's a fair strategy of war. Let them.

Sometimes it's not about winning, it's about making sure your opponent doesn't benefit.

"We should remove lockable doors because my enemy can hide behind it in their town!"

"Kinda hard when they most of the time pearl behind a door in their town, or try to hide in glass, also 80% of the town is doors!"

But I want the ores

 

[Blissterz]

Idk, RI ganks were only really a thing before instanced RIs just cause everyone would be competing for the same materials at the same time. Making this change might add some risk to having to go to an RI, maybe at least make it more difficult, as there will be more people there if you are able to gank for a profit.

Disable invis at ri