Implemented Next ranked season rewards

[opelafer]

The ranked season ended yesterday and I think the new ranks are a good addition to scale your skill level, but I think too many players were rewarded with titles (duelist and gladiator) and now it isn’t really special to have it anymore.
I think for next season you should bring out new titles and decrease the amount of players who can get this title by maybe setting up a new minimum rank level requirement because even though there was a decay, people could still stop queuing for weeks and get a reward after playing a few games

 

[olpx]

I completely agree with this statement it made the titles completely not rare and how they were top 5 or top 10 need a different title

 

[Wxndernut]

I think this was probably the best ranked season loka has had but there still are a lot of improvements that should be made. I think that they should keep duelist and gladiator as a reward but just increase the requirement so that its closer to being like top 5-7 for gladiator and top 15-20 for duelist. I think gladiator should have been for anyone Diamond 3 and up and duelist probably diamond 1 and up.

 

[Kippehz]

I think this was probably the best ranked season loka has had but there still are a lot of improvements that should be made. I think that they should keep duelist and gladiator as a reward but just increase the requirement so that its closer to being like top 5-7 for gladiator and top 15-20 for duelist. I think gladiator should have been for anyone Diamond 3 and up and duelist probably diamond 1 and up.

trust me i do not care

 

[Lurnn]

this time can we have a set time on the ranked seasons length and possibly just a shorter season? (I understand this is primarily for those who actually play the server day to day but many of us can't due to time constrictions and other commitments) I'm just asking as many of the top players from the beggining / throughout the season were just queing eachother day in day out and eventually stopped as it seemed to have no end nothing was changing, I'm happy to say this as a whole didn't have a hugely negative outcome as a great player still came out on top

This almost 4 month long season was far too long in my opinion.

 

[Wxndernut]

This almost 4 month long season was far too long in my opinion.

True I think 3 months is probably the perfect season length

 

[Lurnn]

True I think 3 months is probably the perfect season length

I still disagree I think people are really undermining how long of a time that really is, what is the true need for a 3 month season, you can easily require a same level of accuracy and I'd debate a greater one in a significantly shorter amount of time. maybe that's just me

 

[koi0001]

Three months is a bit extensive considering how small the player pool becomes the higher the rank is.

 

[Wxndernut]

I still disagree I think people are really undermining how long of a time that really is, what is the true need for a 3 month season, you can easily require a same level of accuracy and I'd debate a greater one in a significantly shorter amount of time. maybe that's just me

I just think that it should be 3 months long because titles are given out. If the seasons are too short everyone is going to have the titles.

 

[Lurnn]

I just think that it should be 3 months long because titles are given out. If the seasons are too short everyone is going to have the titles.

No one necessarily said that there had to be ranked seasons running nonstop either though, if you still wanted persé only 4 seasons a year do that, it builds more hype anyways, what's the difference with 4 back to back to back to back seasons, no hype it's all the same.

Atleast with new seasons you're maybe even giving the staff a chance to release new incentives inbetween, new maps (if we're lucky) work on the system more before pushing it nonstop too.

(concept idea i'm about to spit and it may be seen as dumb so bare with it)

6 weeks per season, 6 weeks rest inbetween each, for example if you started this at the beginning of the calendar year we go 6 weeks from Jan 1st, until February 14th. Then we chill till April Fools when we back at it again, 6 weeks. Close out in may 14th, Skip to the peak of holidays, July 1st through to August 14th. Back for October, obviously running through mid November.

Now that isn't the "revolutionary" part of that idea obviously that's just a spitball of dates and what I think would be a nice breakup to the Ranked Season in a calendar year and is completely personal preference, what I think would be cool then is during late November through to late December (maybe just before Christmas) we have a Ranked Ultimate season, compiled of (not going to set a specific number as obviously this DOES lock many members of the community out from playing in this season) but just for example the top 10-20 from each of the four seasons all compete for the superbowl if you will and then winner gets extra cool title/rewards however you please. (if you really wanted to be exclusive go lower but I don't think that's necessary a bigger pool is usually better anyways just not so big that certain people are practically Elo Boosts)

just a random concept that cropped into my head willing to hear thoughts on it

 

[Obstinance]

The ranked season ended yesterday and I think the new ranks are a good addition to scale your skill level, but I think too many players were rewarded with titles (duelist and gladiator) and now it isn’t really special to have it anymore.
I think for next season you should bring out new titles and decrease the amount of players who can get this title by maybe setting up a new minimum rank level requirement because even though there was a decay, people could still stop queuing for weeks and get a reward after playing a few games

+1 skybattledemon got duelist to copy me

 

[Fxqme]

+1 the titles are ruined half the tab is duelist, aslo the ffa kit should of had a dif title and not duelist

 

[czmpos]

shorter seasons + more titles (gladiator and duelist are no more exclusive or rare)