No Plans to Implement Vulnerability

[GeekyKidGamer]

Since people are able to show up to a neutral fight to stop it, they should make their vuln time start again for two hours. For example. Let’s say FoxyBearGames places on a neutral, and JammyMass shows up to the fight. Once he kills a player/golem his town/alliance would become vulnerable for attacks since he participated in conquest.

 

[brandonzx3]

+1 jammin_mas down

 

[FoxyBearGames]

+1 even though you used me as an example, its kinda stupid that they are able to show up to other peoples neutral's, and from my perspective of showing to other people's- it only makes sense. also, fix the issue where diego/silent can show up to my neutrals lol.

 

[SilentStormSix]

fix the issue where diego/silent can show up to my neutrals lol.

foxy it has already been fixed

 

[Jammin_Mas]

-1 claiming a neutral should not be held under the same category as a conquest fight.

 

[Cryptite]

Twas a bugerino for cross-continent neutral interference; neutrals are fine as is. Becoming wholly vulnerable because you want to stop somebody taking land on your continent is overkill and would lead to a lot less neutral ganks.