No Plans to Implement A change to ban appeals

[koi0001]

I appreciate the sentiment but I think keeping appeals relatively simple and as they are now does what it should.

 

[Cryptite]

all I see in a system like that is a waste of time and many, many people calling bias based on what we do and don't classify as evidence

To hammer home on this; it's in the best interest of the entire community of Loka that everybody sees what evidence is provided. If it's "secretly provided to admins", all that will wind up doing is eroding trust in the staff team who is being given evidence "in secret that nobody else can see". There are on occasion good reasons to provide evidence to admins in DMs, mostly so you don't out yourself, but most evidence can and should be posted on appeals by players.

Everybody should see all the evidence, posts, etc. The only thing that can't be known is what the staff team literally talks about in a VC, basically, when it comes time to discussing appeals.

 

[Deleted member 1854]

For example in Prodxgy's unban appeal, a player who had not logged on in over 4 years wrote an entire essay on why they believe a player should not be unbanned. This caused the appeal to go into a full stage argument and just "nuked" the appeal.

I still don’t understand what not having logged onto the server for 4 years has anything to do with commenting under an appeal... but you do you!

 

[Zachary_N_Kaleno]

Preparing for the future of this thread.