No Plans to Implement Alliance Chest?

[TheFreshLemon]

bump

Hi I just wanted to bump this because I like the idea and suggested it before as well. I am bumping it because these past issues can be solved with possible new additions to the alliance perms that we got last month. (Preventening towns in the alliance doing stuff, etc).

• Prevent it in battlezones like the current gchest
• Restrict in Fallen/Foreign towns
• Ability to block log the chest or some way of seeing who took what
• Ability to prevent a town in alliance from opening the chest/taking from it.

 

[Cryptite]

While Alliances confer some obvious benefits and advantages vs singular towns, a lot of the way we balance Alliances is making them basically act like one big town. I feel like an Alliance Chest is just one more thing that makes Alliances an absolute must, vs just a way to achieve more success on the battlefield.

 

[SilentStormSix]

Why fallen towns?

 

[TheFreshLemon]

Why fallen towns?

I believe Koi or Pac didn't want the ability to take a bunch of stuff from a raid w/o the risk of dying.
Edit: It was pack on page 1. And when I mean fallen towns I mean recently fallen towns.

 

[Magpieman]

As Cryptite said, the idea of alliances is to act as one giant town. The only way we would allow an alliance chest is if we also disabled all town chests when you joined an alliance. I imagine most people would prefer to keep their town chests over this.

 

[Samisol]

I imagine most people would prefer to keep their town chests over this.

Why only have a chest filled with your town members' firestones when you could have a chest filled with your whole alliances' firestones!!!!!???

 

[Lurnn]

. I imagine most people would prefer to keep their town chests over this.

indeed