make people be able to fly in their own town and any town they are builders on
Welcome to our Forums!
Type /register while in-game to register for a forum account.
Suggestion Elytra Limitations
- Thread starter DevvyVR
- Start date
What do you mean by this? The RI's all have about the equal amount of ores scattered throughout them, the whole "Garama is the best" is a myth really, one that caused people to frequent garama more often, therefore learning there way around the caves better and also concluding that garama was the best.
All the RIs are in fact even. As Lurnn said Garama being the best is a myth, likely because it's the simplest to navigate when compared to Kalros or Ascalon.
Sake of argument, even if they are all equal, wouldn't that mean that Garama has the highest density when compared since Ascalon RI underground is massive compared to Garama
fr i’m pretty confident it’s more efficient to strip mine then to go to ascalon ri
Adawee. That's because the policy is oppressive, next time don't vote badman5 into power.
Zaidgvv
Active Member
Yes but ascalon is way bigger than garama and kalros is hell to navigate because of all of the lava in it
Fwiw, the Resource isles are coming up on like 5~ years of age.
Personally, I think the resource isles shouldn't be a factor within the whole policy picking part of conquest.
EDIT: From the sounds of it, and this is from a totally unqualified point of view, I have very little insight into how the ores are generated. The issue is that the sizes and ease of navigation aren't equal across all Resource Isles.
Personally, a trip to Ascalon RI gives less than Garama and Garama takes up significantly less time. You could argue that the odds of encountering another player are much larger at Garama but I've been ganked more often within Ascalon RI.
I know there has been some discussion about new resource isles or resource isles changing to account for the increase in Y we now have compared to originally designed. This discussion is starting to get off topic though.
Personally, I think the resource isles shouldn't be a factor within the whole policy picking part of conquest.
EDIT: From the sounds of it, and this is from a totally unqualified point of view, I have very little insight into how the ores are generated. The issue is that the sizes and ease of navigation aren't equal across all Resource Isles.
Personally, a trip to Ascalon RI gives less than Garama and Garama takes up significantly less time. You could argue that the odds of encountering another player are much larger at Garama but I've been ganked more often within Ascalon RI.
I know there has been some discussion about new resource isles or resource isles changing to account for the increase in Y we now have compared to originally designed. This discussion is starting to get off topic though.
To be fair, if they're mathematically even, but Garama's is simplest to navigate, then they are not even.
so who's gonna make that thread
You're so good with threads and all that you should do it kiad, I'd only make it a mess
This is why democracy is bad.
if you're all about democracy let those same people vote for alliance leader
When me and sigma used to mine quite actively we pulled 6 stacks + of diamonds pretty much every ascalon RI trip, this being the most out of all RI's we mined usually.
you just doin something wrong my guy
Hi Ljorni
hey
Ascalon RI is really the only RI I know how to navigate. Kalros I can't find, Garama is somewhat decent, but eh.
You can't find the RI for kalros?
or you can't find the cave entrance to cash resources.