What's new
Loka Forums

Type /register while in-game to register for a forums account.

Kzrmq Unban Appeal #1

Status
Not open for further replies.
+1 horrible job ssing and shouldn't be banned for some random thing he used for a whole nother game that apparently doesn't let what777 screenshare him.
 
+1 if we doing this might as well ban the whole server away. The amount of cheaters on this server is crazy and we banning the big man kzrmq lock tf in loka. Yall stat padding bans at this point smh.
 
+1 gng he wasent even killing anyone he was running around at cove like a lil stone 3 recruit he dosent even play like that
 
"I had turned some process that are needed for ssing off"
This is probably a disabled service(s), no person should be perm banned for this, thats just insane and if you want to ban for "bypassing methods" then it needs to be very clear in your rules set that disabled services leads to punishment, and even then you should only be banning if you have actual suspension of cheating (Which I don't think there is considering we're talking about a player in Stone rank)

There are many reasons someone's services can be for a normal disabled, ranging from debloat scripts (can range from simple .bat to powershell scripts, gets rid of unnecessary programs/files on your computer) to running optimization tweaks that disable services to increase performance, this is also extremely common for other games like Fortnite (as mentioned) where people run optimizations packs all the time to get the most of their PC to even running programs that will disable it for extra performance like Hone Optimizer (my infamous case when I was subhumaned falsely.) Even Razer Cortex disables services to my knowledge, although I could be wrong.

The person here should be free'd up immediately without delay, the ban is insane considering what harsh punishment and no mention of disabled services in any sort of rules or notice about screensharing.
Proper places that do ban for disabled services often do only temp bans at most regardless for a first punishment, and also make it extremely clear by having "Screenshare Guidelines" on what you should have enabled and disabled like in Ranked Bedwars, even McTiers.

+1 free them, if they aren't going to be free'd then there should be transparency on what other evidence there is to indicate without a doubt they are cheating (Why even Screenshare at that point?)
so if i use hone i get banned?
 
+1 70% of what777 bans are BS and dont make much sense at all especially this one. Maybe next time run the top 50 people instead of the bottom 500
 
Its actually so funny how dumb of a ban this is, the reason real cheaters arent banned is because they bypass screenshares and nothing happens to them, and then yet an innocent guy gets banned for "bypassing", who is also in stone, where was this in the rules??? 🤣🤣🤣
 
Based on the anti-cheat logs from multiple, separate instances on the day you were banned, you triggered many anticheat violations that are reliable checks for cheating.

On Loka, we always conduct screenshares, even when the anti-cheat logs would be reason enough to ban someone. This is to provide the user with an avenue where they can prove their innocence, even when the logs show them to be blatantly cheating. If, during that screenshare, the user alters their system to compromise, obfuscate, inhibit, or generally degrade the screenshare, we will act on evidence we have and presume the anti-SS tactics as further proof of cheating. An inability on our end to screenshare is not proof of innocence, and in cases where our SSers have had issues on our end, we have not banned players because “we” couldn’t figure it out. We know when a SS is being tampered with.

In this case, among other services, you had both SysMain and DiagTrack fully disabled. SysMain is a service explicitly aimed at improving performance; an optimizer disabling this would be counterproductive. Other system features were also non-functional: recent files, background activity monitor, and USN Journal.

These services were also not disabled all at once, but at different times, further pointing towards you manually disabling them to hinder the screenshare process rather than a cleaner or optimizer disabling them all at once.

Illegal mods were also found in your instance, although they were not used as the reason to ban you, because they do not track with our detected anticheat violations. Among these mods were “Marlow crystal optimizer” and “Dokko’s hotbar optimizer.” You fail to mention this in your appeal, but this was discussed during the screenshare. The mod description of “Dokko’s hotbar optimizer” explicitly states it improves gameplay and has a disclaimer stating, “This mod may be detected as a cheat by some anti-cheats.” This mod alone would have been grounds for a permanent ban.

The following findings were not factored into the decision to ban you, but are relevant for context. There were traces of prior Meteor client usage in your Loka instance, as well as recent usage of Doomsday. We have no evidence that you were using these on Loka, but they had been used recently, conflating with the time of you disabling system services which leads credence to the disabling of these services being an intentional act to prevent you from being caught cheating on Loka or other servers.

It’s a poor suggestion that rendering a SS impossible should grant you some level of leniency. As stated, we know when a SS is being tampered with. Even with some of the proposed changes to the rules, the outcome would have been the same, based on the evidence, and behavior during the SS. The ban will remain.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top