What's new
Loka Forums

Type /register while in-game to register for a forums account.

Making a town.

Mtndome

Member
Slicer
Okay, I had this on Toi's suggestion and decided to make a separate thread.

I DO NOT like the fact that anyone on the server can make a town. Far too often, what could be a great town falls through the cracks because there is not enough interest/resources/etc. Besides, everyone wants to make a town.

I propose having existing towns sponsor new towns. This can be in effect for only new gens. If folks want to go out and build a town first, then appeal to a town for sponsorship, that's fine. This may even draw members to join towns first, then make their own with approval from their home city.

The existing town can provide (or make the new town farm mats for) a gen. The existing town can set up some form of agreement between new and old, allowing new town alliances to be made. For example:

Say I want to make a town, called Town Loka. It is to be a town in the mountains, focusing on lore. However, I need more folks interested in it to make it viable. I would go to spawn and decide I want Cryptite's town, Asgard, to sponsor me. I would approach Asgard and say, "Yo dawg. I leik yur town. Can you sponsor me?" Crypt, after much deliberation, agrees under conditions.

Conditions could be something like:

You must have 4 active members willing to participate.
Any books that are written or acquired will be shared between us mutually to further lore on Loka.
You are to remain a neutral city.
Asgard members should have perms in Town Loka.
etc etc etc.
(This could vary with each Town type: Power, Outlaws, Beauty, and Wealth)

Once I find four members, and agree to his terms, Asgard would officially sponsor Town Loka. A gen, under Asgard, can be made with a restricted radius. Lets say radius of no more than 100. This will provide protection for the new town, and give Asgardians a side project. Once Town Loka is built, or agreed by the sponsor it can provide for itself, Town Loka can make its own gen.

I believe this is a solid idea, because it can bring like individuals together to make nicer towns. Everyone and their mother have ideas for towns. But if you can get folks to agree on a town, it has a much better chance of succeeding. More towns=more draw to the server and an all around better Loka. It also lets towns that don't have much to do, such as Asgard, a side project.
Any agreement, or modification to this, would be greatly appreciated.
 
mopb3 said:
KenuDragonfire said:
HC: Essentially an asylum ran by the detainees.
Heheheh *dons wardens cap* .

Kenu. Comment about HC is Soo true!!! I love it. I LOL'd at work.


Mopb, in no way are you the warden of HC. You have no control of my lands
<3

My allegiance to any admin now goes to the sheep.
 
JocelynReed said:
mopb3 said:
KenuDragonfire said:
HC: Essentially an asylum ran by the detainees.
Heheheh *dons wardens cap* .

Kenu. Comment about HC is Soo true!!! I love it. I LOL'd at work.


Mopb, in no way are you the warden of HC. You have no control of my lands
<3

My allegiance to any admin now goes to the sheep.
Your lands? I didn't think hidden crevice belonged to you any more?
 
This is actually an interesting line of thought. Let us say, hypothetically, that we accepted mtn's described system and had all new towns from this point on require continuous sponsorship from a town that already exists. That would make all the current towns much more powerful in the eyes of new players, and making a new town would become slightly less desirable, since most people don't want to live at the mercy of someone else. However, there are always a handful of people with a vision for a new town that they refuse to give up on, and those people might be willing to be sponsored. It reminds me of a colonial system. There would be a huge risk in rebelling against the town that sponsored you, since it would leave you vulnerable. However, you might not fear rebelling against your sponser town if you made a deal with another town to have them sponsor you instead. The system relies on the continued presence of at least a handful of the current towns, and grants those towns both physical and bargaining power.

Of course, the server has already decided it has no problem with making certain players permanent parts of the server over others based on the personal preference of those in power. Given that, there isn't much out of place in the system mtn is proposing.
 
Back
Top