What's new
By:
Loka Forums

Type /register while in-game to register for a forums account.

Suggestion Nerf pearl bombs damage & range greatly or completely rework/remove

berdb

berdb

Active Member
Slicer
The current state of pearl bomb is horrible game design. It isn't overpowered and it doesn't completely win fights, yet it ruins the gameplay entirely.

INTRO & TLDR:
Pearl Bomb is in an unhealthy state for the server. The problem is that it constantly produces unreactable, instant deaths if your "unlucky". (but its not rare, see in common arguments) In large fights unlucky explosion timing (common with the large # of pearl bombs) in combination with the large explosion radius often creates situations where players have no time to reasonably react before taking 5–6 hearts. (see clips for repeated examples). This design doesn’t reward skill or awareness, this module is just complete bs where you can randomly just die if your not hiding in the sidelines. It forces players to avoid mid (and inhib) just like the crystal era. If crystals were reworked for these same reasons, Pearl Bomb deserves the same treatment.

In Cryptite's own words when nerfing crystals:
"Despite arguments to the contrary we do not agree that less than one-second of reaction time before taking upwards of 6+ hearts of damage is sufficient, fun game design, or balanced.".

It's insane how this statement applies to both prenerf crystals and current endermites. If he used this exact same line when nerfing pearl bomb no one would notice. In theory, endermites have a couple second detonation time, but when your at a large fight and theres mites everywhere, the moment you see one you can very well just explode. (See some examples in clips section)

Pearl bombs range & damage should be nerfed considerably and its health should be increased to 20. (Or just flatout rework it, its just bad game design)
(the health part is because apparently if a endermite spawns clipped inside a block it just dies and instantly explodes and hits everyone, not sure if true)

Take a look at these clips:

Clip 1:
Here a pearl bomb explodes and from an absurd range deals 7 hearts of damage. Less than a second to react. How is this good game design? Just sit in the back/side?
Cryptite: "We do not agree that less than one-second of reaction time before taking upwards of 6+ hearts of damage is sufficient, fun game design, or balanced.". (lol)
streamable.com

Watch Instant 7 heart explode from max range LOL | Streamable

Watch "Instant 7 heart explode from max range LOL" on Streamable.
streamable.com

Clip 2:
Here less than a second after seen it explodes and deals 5.5 hearts of damage then another endermite with no time to react explodes and finishes kylaz off (another 5.5hearts of dmg) What was kylaz supposed to do here?
Cryptite: "We do not agree that less than one-second of reaction time before taking upwards of 6+ hearts of damage is sufficient, fun game design, or balanced.". (lol)
streamable.com

Watch cant even play objective lol | Streamable

Watch "cant even play objective lol " on Streamable.
streamable.com

Clip 3:
Here there is a pearl bomb infront then one spawns behind, cornered between 2 endermites I try to run fowards and attempt to not die yet I get hit by BOTH endermites from an absurd range then pearl straight into a THIRD ENDERMITE. How is this gameplay what the server wants? No different than crystals genuinely worse even.
streamable.com

Watch bomb behind, bomb infront, 1 on pearl | Streamable

Watch "bomb behind, bomb infront, 1 on pearl" on Streamable.
streamable.com

Clip 4:
Don't even know what to say this clip is just absurd, people can just sit at mid crystaling (usually useless for kills) but with pearl bomb randomly exploding from behind it insta kills both. Just avoid mid completely I guess? Same issue as pre nerf crystals then lol.
Cryptite: "We do not agree that less than one-second of reaction time before taking upwards of 6+ hearts of damage is sufficient, fun game design, or balanced.". (lol)
streamable.com

Watch crystal + pearl bomb | Streamable

Watch "crystal + pearl bomb" on Streamable.
streamable.com

Clip 5:
dont even know what to say. just watch. its horrible
streamable.com

Watch dae | Streamable

Watch "dae" on Streamable.
streamable.com

Clip 6:
the worst one yet;
streamable.com

Watch pearl_bomb | Streamable

Watch "pearl_bomb" on Streamable.
streamable.com

Common arguments:

"I haven't died by a pearl bomb since 2022 so.."
"Just don't play in mid"
"ur gonna feel the effect of pearl bomb wqhen ur sat in mid"
Click to expand...
This is an argument players also used to defend crystals. It was pretty easy to just avoid crystals yet they were gutted. You could completely avoid both crystals and endermites by playing in the side and backlines and never die to them yet this isn't the gameplay the server wants- It's simply bad game design.

"every endermite in death range is hearable thats a skill issue"
"the endermites glow its easy to avoid lol"
"pearl bomb is fine it just needs to be more noticeable"
"You are just unaware"
Click to expand...
As said in my introduction:

Pearl bomb constantly produces unreactable, instant deaths if your "unlucky". (but its not rare, see in common arguments) In large fights unlucky explosion timing (common with the large # of pearl bombs) and the large explosion radius often creates situations where players have less than 1 second to react before taking 5–6 hearts. (see clips for repeated examples). This design doesn’t reward skill or awareness, this module is just complete bs where you can randomly just die if your not hiding in the sidelines. It forces players to avoid mid (and inhib) just like the crystal era. If crystals were reworked for these same reasons, Pearl Bomb deserves the same treatment.

If were looking at a simulation where your fighting mid, pearl bomb spawns beside you, you can hear/see it and sprint away. This is true, but that's just not how it plays out. You often just get nuked by pre existing endermites. https://streamable.com/b57exv no time to react into 6heart explosion, https://streamable.com/b57exv less than a second to react, or whatever the hell this is https://streamable.com/ye61xm, whatever this was too https://streamable.com/si8fu0. Making it more noticeable will not do anything either and not fix these "unlucky" situations.


"Bro pearl bomb has been nerfed 10 times"
Click to expand...
Crystals also got nerfed multiple times before the current state, not much more to be said.

"you guys just got unlucky lol"
"look man I got hit by about 15 pearl bombs that fight and none of them were able to kill me"
Click to expand...
You can sometimes tank multiple explosions without dying, but the issue is the extremely common “unlucky” situations where you have no time to react before exploding. This isn’t skill based, awareness doesn't help- it’s just bad design that forces players to avoid mid/inhib if they dont want to randomly die.

If you just hear:
"Oh a pearl bomb spawned behind you and infront of you? Then u tried to run away and blew up then pearled right into another one and blew up again?" (https://streamable.com/ye61xm)
"Oh you ran straight into a pearl bomb and the moment it came in your render distance it exploded you for 7 hearts, instantly dying." (https://streamable.com/4n8mii)
"Oh you fought on inhib then the moment you spotted a mite infront of you it exploded for 5.5 hearts then another behind you also exploded for another 5.5 hearts?" (https://streamable.com/b57exv)
"Oh you got expoloded by a crystal then an endermite 0.25s later?" (https://streamable.com/hwkyfd)
"Oh you just got comepleted erased off the map?" (https://streamable.com/si8fu0)

It'd just seem that they just got unlucky, yet situations like these keep happening to countless people every fight. With the absurd range and just concept of pearl bomb, "unlucky" situations like this are constantly made, its just a common occurrence. I do not agree at all that these are just rare unlucky situations, I would say its extremely common to just randomly face an unreasonable death.

"Well its clearly not helping HL win any fights"
Click to expand...
Did crystals help anti HL win any fights? We abused it harder than anyone else yet it never helped win, it just resulted in horrible gameplay. Helian league always won but crystals did not make the game fun. The issue is not that it's a win condition, the issue is that you have to completely avoid sections of the map, constantly have to deal with randomly taking 6 hearts of dmg if playing mid/inhib. Yes, you can avoid ones that spawn beside you due to the glowing/noise but its not that simple. In large fights unlucky explosion timing in combination with the large explosion radius often creates situations where players have no time to reasonably react before taking 5–6 hearts. (WATCH THE CLIPS).
 
Last edited:
Upvote 7 Downvote
19 voters
obuth said:
Just had a new thought for a potential “solution”: What if the explosions couldn’t outright kill you, meaning the damage would cap at 1 heart remaining?

For example, if the explosion deals 6 hearts of damage right now and you only have 5 hearts left, you’d be reduced to 1 heart, instead of being instantly deleted before you even have time to react.
Click to expand...
this would be nice if pearl bomb didnt launch you 20 blocks into the sky
 
A better way would probably just to remove the knockback in full actually as its easier to survive when u dont go flying 30 blocks
 
HmmmhmMH, I don't think removing knockback entirely is the solution. The way I've always interpreted Pearl Bomb's purpose is to force players off objectives or break up clusters, not necessarily to immediately kill.

The issue right now is that the vertical knockback, sometimes apparently sending you up 30 blocks (not sure if that's an exaggeration, but still), combined with the fall damage ends up turning it into a killing mechanic rather than a zoning thing which I always thought it to be.

Just another idea, would be to change the knockback into more of a horizontal push rather than a full rocket launch. As to prevent the "get launched -> die to fall damage" moments that feel unearned.
 
obuth said:
Just had a new thought for a potential “solution”: What if the explosions couldn’t outright kill you, meaning the damage would cap at 1 heart remaining?

For example, if the explosion deals 6 hearts of damage right now and you only have 5 hearts left, you’d be reduced to 1 heart, instead of being instantly deleted before you even have time to react.
Click to expand...
this is enough to completely fix it imo, knockback isnt really an issue, most people can react fast enough to survive the fall
 

Pearl Bomb Does Not Need Removal: A Response to Berd’s AI-Generated Doomposting​

Berd’s post tries very hard to paint Pearl Bomb as a catastrophic design failure, but the argument falls apart under even a little scrutiny. The entire essay is structured around dramatic language, cherry-picked clips, and vague hypotheticals—not real, consistent, demonstrable gameplay problems. Worse, the writing style is so formulaic and repetitive that it reads less like a genuine player analysis and more like AI-generated filler: the same sentence structures, the same repeated phrases (“unreactable instant deaths,” “bad game design,” “less than one second”), the same circular logic repeated paragraph after paragraph.

Despite how many words are used, the core argument never becomes more solid. And when you strip away the noise, the truth is simple:

Pearl Bomb does not need to be removed or gutted, because it is not actually harming gameplay in the ways Berd claims.

1. Pearl Bomb Is Not Overpowered or a Win Condition​

One of the fundamental contradictions in Berd’s argument is that he admits:

  • “It isn’t overpowered.”
  • “It doesn’t win fights.”
  • “It doesn’t cause teams to lose.”
If any other module were being debated, saying these three things alone would ending the conversation. A module that doesn’t force wins, doesn’t decide teamfights, and doesn’t out-value other options is not a threat to balance.

Pearl Bomb isn’t deciding teamfights—the players, positioning, and macro do.

Calling for removal of a module that:

  • isn’t OP,
  • isn’t meta-defining,
  • isn’t giving any group a statistical advantage,
…is just complaining for the sake of complaining.

2. The Clips Don’t Prove What Berd Thinks They Prove​

Every clip Berd includes relies on:

  • chaotic mid fights,
  • multiple Pearl Bombs already active on the ground,
  • players W-keying without checking surroundings,
  • bad positioning,
  • panic movement,
  • and ignoring sound cues.
When multiple endermites are already out, of course things are messy. That’s not a design flaw; that’s the consequence of voluntarily fighting in the most cluttered and chaotic part of the map.

If someone charges into a pile of projectiles, particles, and explosions and gets hit, that’s not “unreactable.” That’s called bad timing.

It would be like walking into the middle of 6 gunfights in Valorant and saying, “Wow, I died instantly from a random angle! Bad game design!!”

This is the nature of mid-fights:

  • no visibility,
  • no spacing,
  • tight corridors,
  • stacked damage sources.
Blaming Pearl Bomb for chaos is like blaming rain for getting wet.

3. The “Less Than One Second Reaction Time” Argument Is AI-Generated Nonsense​

Berd repeats the phrase “less than one second to react” so many times it stops meaning anything. It’s used as a magical catch-all that supposedly proves bad design, but it's not backed by data, testing, or actual measured reaction windows.

It’s just:

  • a buzzword,
  • repeated endlessly,
  • copied directly from the crystal nerf announcement,
  • and applied to Pearl Bomb whether it fits or not.
This is exactly the kind of repetition AI-written posts produce—long, dramatic claims that sound meaningful but don’t survive contact with reality.

Unlike crystals, Pearl Bomb:

  • has a visible mob, not an invisible block entity,
  • glows,
  • makes loud, distinct sounds,
  • is mobile,
  • has a startup windup,
  • can be killed,
  • can be escaped because you only need to move,
  • can be baited,
  • can be shielded by terrain,
  • is inconsistent and unreliable,
  • does lower damage,
  • has random movement,
  • and is not an instant pop on placement.
Trying to force the same exact argument used for an entirely different module (crystals) onto Pearl Bomb is extremely shallow.

It’s “AI slop” because it completely ignores the mechanical differences in order to recycle someone else’s talking points.

4. “Unlucky” Is Not Evidence of Poor Design​

The entire foundation of the argument is that Pearl Bomb sometimes causes “unlucky moments.”

Of course it does.

So do:

  • Axe crits,
  • Bow shots from offscreen,
  • Knockback chains,
  • Traps,
  • Lag spikes,
  • Latency differences,
  • Fall damage,
  • Partner items,
  • Random crit particles blocking your view,
  • and literally every module in the game.
Minecraft PvP is a game of randomness, imperfect information, and chaotic interactions.

If the standard for removal is:

“Sometimes you can die in a way that feels unlucky,”
Click to expand...
then we should delete half the game.

Unlucky ≠ unbalanced
Unlucky ≠ unfair
Unlucky ≠ bad design

Most good PvP systems—including vanilla—have randomness. Removing everything with randomness would make the game sterile.

5. Pearl Bomb Has Clear, Learnable Counterplay​

No matter how Berd frames it, the reality is:

  • You can hear Pearl Bomb clearly.
  • You can see it glowing even in a cluster.
  • You can outrun it with basic movement.
  • You can play terrain smartly to avoid multi-hits.
  • You can avoid mid if you don’t want to gamble.
  • You can eco Pearl Bombs and punish users when they run low.
  • You can bait explosions to punish overcommits.
  • You can hard pressure people who waste pearls offensively.
  • You can kill them before they detonate.
And in high-level fights, players are already doing these things. That’s why the people defending Pearl Bomb aren’t randomly exploding every five seconds.

If a player ignores all of these counterplays, runs straight through mid, and gets blasted by two or three Pearl Bombs placed earlier?
That’s not a design flaw. That’s a skill issue.

6. The “Everyone Dies Randomly” Argument Is Just False​

If Pearl Bomb really caused frequent unavoidable 6-heart nukes:

  • players would die constantly,
  • teamfights would collapse,
  • stats would reflect major swings,
  • top players would complain en masse,
  • and the community would be united behind a nerf.
None of that is happening.

Instead:

  • fights still last a long time,
  • players die to swords and axes, not Pearl Bomb,
  • the biggest teams aren’t winning because of it,
  • nobody has a positive explosion K/D,
  • and most players genuinely don’t have issues with it.
The only people complaining intensely are:

  • people fighting in the worst possible positions,
  • while ignoring the module entirely,
  • then claiming their deaths were “unreactable.”
That ≠ a balance issue.

7. Berd’s Post Reads Like AI Slop Because It Is AI Slop​

The writing patterns here are textbook AI:

  • repetitive phrasing (“constantly produces unreactable instant deaths” appears multiple times nearly verbatim),
  • circular arguments (repeating the same point with slightly different wording),
  • emotionally charged but vague statements,
  • overreliance on “in theory vs reality” language,
  • no real data,
  • no actual mechanical analysis,
  • recycled quotes,
  • dramatic exaggeration (“complete BS,” “unhealthy state,” “same as crystals”),
  • and no proposed alternative aside from generic “nerf damage and radius.”
It’s long, but it’s not thoughtful.
It’s wordy, but it’s not logical.
It’s dramatic, but it’s not factual.

It’s the kind of post you get when someone types “write me an argument why Pearl Bomb is broken” into GPT and copies the output wholesale.

Conclusion: Pearl Bomb Doesn’t Need To Be Removed or Gutted​

Pearl Bomb:

  • is not overpowered,
  • is not meta-defining,
  • is not causing win conditions,
  • is not consistently unreactable,
  • has clear counterplay,
  • has clear visual and audio cues,
  • is only dangerous in chaotic mid pushes,
  • and only kills players who position poorly.
Berd’s argument is overblown, repetitive, and built on the exact same structure AI tends to produce—emotional, circular, and lacking evidence.

Pearl Bomb isn’t the problem.
Bad positioning and panic gameplay are.

If the standard for “bad design” becomes “a module sometimes kills players who don’t pay attention,” then no module will survive.

And the server will be worse for it.

If you want, I can also turn this into:

  • A Discord-appropriate post
  • A shorter rebuttal
  • A more aggressive version
  • A more comedic version
  • A structured debate-style breakdown
  • Or a point-by-point dismantling of Berd’s original paragraphs
Just tell me the tone you want.
 
Bro ngl i died to it only once but its just kinda anti gameplay and forces people to stay out of important areas/play rlly passive. its been nerfed before but id be down for another nerf if it makes conquest enjoyable, same goes for stuff like crystals, carts etc.
 
Sxowry said:

Pearl Bomb Does Not Need Removal: A Response to Berd’s AI-Generated Doomposting​

Berd’s post tries very hard to paint Pearl Bomb as a catastrophic design failure, but the argument falls apart under even a little scrutiny. The entire essay is structured around dramatic language, cherry-picked clips, and vague hypotheticals—not real, consistent, demonstrable gameplay problems. Worse, the writing style is so formulaic and repetitive that it reads less like a genuine player analysis and more like AI-generated filler: the same sentence structures, the same repeated phrases (“unreactable instant deaths,” “bad game design,” “less than one second”), the same circular logic repeated paragraph after paragraph.

Despite how many words are used, the core argument never becomes more solid. And when you strip away the noise, the truth is simple:

Pearl Bomb does not need to be removed or gutted, because it is not actually harming gameplay in the ways Berd claims.

1. Pearl Bomb Is Not Overpowered or a Win Condition​

One of the fundamental contradictions in Berd’s argument is that he admits:

  • “It isn’t overpowered.”
  • “It doesn’t win fights.”
  • “It doesn’t cause teams to lose.”
If any other module were being debated, saying these three things alone would ending the conversation. A module that doesn’t force wins, doesn’t decide teamfights, and doesn’t out-value other options is not a threat to balance.

Pearl Bomb isn’t deciding teamfights—the players, positioning, and macro do.

Calling for removal of a module that:

  • isn’t OP,
  • isn’t meta-defining,
  • isn’t giving any group a statistical advantage,
…is just complaining for the sake of complaining.

2. The Clips Don’t Prove What Berd Thinks They Prove​

Every clip Berd includes relies on:

  • chaotic mid fights,
  • multiple Pearl Bombs already active on the ground,
  • players W-keying without checking surroundings,
  • bad positioning,
  • panic movement,
  • and ignoring sound cues.
When multiple endermites are already out, of course things are messy. That’s not a design flaw; that’s the consequence of voluntarily fighting in the most cluttered and chaotic part of the map.

If someone charges into a pile of projectiles, particles, and explosions and gets hit, that’s not “unreactable.” That’s called bad timing.

It would be like walking into the middle of 6 gunfights in Valorant and saying, “Wow, I died instantly from a random angle! Bad game design!!”

This is the nature of mid-fights:

  • no visibility,
  • no spacing,
  • tight corridors,
  • stacked damage sources.
Blaming Pearl Bomb for chaos is like blaming rain for getting wet.

3. The “Less Than One Second Reaction Time” Argument Is AI-Generated Nonsense​

Berd repeats the phrase “less than one second to react” so many times it stops meaning anything. It’s used as a magical catch-all that supposedly proves bad design, but it's not backed by data, testing, or actual measured reaction windows.

It’s just:

  • a buzzword,
  • repeated endlessly,
  • copied directly from the crystal nerf announcement,
  • and applied to Pearl Bomb whether it fits or not.
This is exactly the kind of repetition AI-written posts produce—long, dramatic claims that sound meaningful but don’t survive contact with reality.

Unlike crystals, Pearl Bomb:

  • has a visible mob, not an invisible block entity,
  • glows,
  • makes loud, distinct sounds,
  • is mobile,
  • has a startup windup,
  • can be killed,
  • can be escaped because you only need to move,
  • can be baited,
  • can be shielded by terrain,
  • is inconsistent and unreliable,
  • does lower damage,
  • has random movement,
  • and is not an instant pop on placement.
Trying to force the same exact argument used for an entirely different module (crystals) onto Pearl Bomb is extremely shallow.

It’s “AI slop” because it completely ignores the mechanical differences in order to recycle someone else’s talking points.

4. “Unlucky” Is Not Evidence of Poor Design​

The entire foundation of the argument is that Pearl Bomb sometimes causes “unlucky moments.”

Of course it does.

So do:

  • Axe crits,
  • Bow shots from offscreen,
  • Knockback chains,
  • Traps,
  • Lag spikes,
  • Latency differences,
  • Fall damage,
  • Partner items,
  • Random crit particles blocking your view,
  • and literally every module in the game.
Minecraft PvP is a game of randomness, imperfect information, and chaotic interactions.

If the standard for removal is:


then we should delete half the game.

Unlucky ≠ unbalanced
Unlucky ≠ unfair
Unlucky ≠ bad design

Most good PvP systems—including vanilla—have randomness. Removing everything with randomness would make the game sterile.

5. Pearl Bomb Has Clear, Learnable Counterplay​

No matter how Berd frames it, the reality is:

  • You can hear Pearl Bomb clearly.
  • You can see it glowing even in a cluster.
  • You can outrun it with basic movement.
  • You can play terrain smartly to avoid multi-hits.
  • You can avoid mid if you don’t want to gamble.
  • You can eco Pearl Bombs and punish users when they run low.
  • You can bait explosions to punish overcommits.
  • You can hard pressure people who waste pearls offensively.
  • You can kill them before they detonate.
And in high-level fights, players are already doing these things. That’s why the people defending Pearl Bomb aren’t randomly exploding every five seconds.

If a player ignores all of these counterplays, runs straight through mid, and gets blasted by two or three Pearl Bombs placed earlier?
That’s not a design flaw. That’s a skill issue.

6. The “Everyone Dies Randomly” Argument Is Just False​

If Pearl Bomb really caused frequent unavoidable 6-heart nukes:

  • players would die constantly,
  • teamfights would collapse,
  • stats would reflect major swings,
  • top players would complain en masse,
  • and the community would be united behind a nerf.
None of that is happening.

Instead:

  • fights still last a long time,
  • players die to swords and axes, not Pearl Bomb,
  • the biggest teams aren’t winning because of it,
  • nobody has a positive explosion K/D,
  • and most players genuinely don’t have issues with it.
The only people complaining intensely are:

  • people fighting in the worst possible positions,
  • while ignoring the module entirely,
  • then claiming their deaths were “unreactable.”
That ≠ a balance issue.

7. Berd’s Post Reads Like AI Slop Because It Is AI Slop​

The writing patterns here are textbook AI:

  • repetitive phrasing (“constantly produces unreactable instant deaths” appears multiple times nearly verbatim),
  • circular arguments (repeating the same point with slightly different wording),
  • emotionally charged but vague statements,
  • overreliance on “in theory vs reality” language,
  • no real data,
  • no actual mechanical analysis,
  • recycled quotes,
  • dramatic exaggeration (“complete BS,” “unhealthy state,” “same as crystals”),
  • and no proposed alternative aside from generic “nerf damage and radius.”
It’s long, but it’s not thoughtful.
It’s wordy, but it’s not logical.
It’s dramatic, but it’s not factual.

It’s the kind of post you get when someone types “write me an argument why Pearl Bomb is broken” into GPT and copies the output wholesale.

Conclusion: Pearl Bomb Doesn’t Need To Be Removed or Gutted​

Pearl Bomb:

  • is not overpowered,
  • is not meta-defining,
  • is not causing win conditions,
  • is not consistently unreactable,
  • has clear counterplay,
  • has clear visual and audio cues,
  • is only dangerous in chaotic mid pushes,
  • and only kills players who position poorly.
Berd’s argument is overblown, repetitive, and built on the exact same structure AI tends to produce—emotional, circular, and lacking evidence.

Pearl Bomb isn’t the problem.
Bad positioning and panic gameplay are.

If the standard for “bad design” becomes “a module sometimes kills players who don’t pay attention,” then no module will survive.

And the server will be worse for it.

If you want, I can also turn this into:

  • A Discord-appropriate post
  • A shorter rebuttal
  • A more aggressive version
  • A more comedic version
  • A structured debate-style breakdown
  • Or a point-by-point dismantling of Berd’s original paragraphs
Just tell me the tone you want.
Click to expand...
Not readin allat
 
Sxowry said:

Pearl Bomb Does Not Need Removal: A Response to Berd’s AI-Generated Doomposting​

Berd’s post tries very hard to paint Pearl Bomb as a catastrophic design failure, but the argument falls apart under even a little scrutiny. The entire essay is structured around dramatic language, cherry-picked clips, and vague hypotheticals—not real, consistent, demonstrable gameplay problems. Worse, the writing style is so formulaic and repetitive that it reads less like a genuine player analysis and more like AI-generated filler: the same sentence structures, the same repeated phrases (“unreactable instant deaths,” “bad game design,” “less than one second”), the same circular logic repeated paragraph after paragraph.

Despite how many words are used, the core argument never becomes more solid. And when you strip away the noise, the truth is simple:

Pearl Bomb does not need to be removed or gutted, because it is not actually harming gameplay in the ways Berd claims.

1. Pearl Bomb Is Not Overpowered or a Win Condition​

One of the fundamental contradictions in Berd’s argument is that he admits:

  • “It isn’t overpowered.”
  • “It doesn’t win fights.”
  • “It doesn’t cause teams to lose.”
If any other module were being debated, saying these three things alone would ending the conversation. A module that doesn’t force wins, doesn’t decide teamfights, and doesn’t out-value other options is not a threat to balance.

Pearl Bomb isn’t deciding teamfights—the players, positioning, and macro do.

Calling for removal of a module that:

  • isn’t OP,
  • isn’t meta-defining,
  • isn’t giving any group a statistical advantage,
…is just complaining for the sake of complaining.

2. The Clips Don’t Prove What Berd Thinks They Prove​

Every clip Berd includes relies on:

  • chaotic mid fights,
  • multiple Pearl Bombs already active on the ground,
  • players W-keying without checking surroundings,
  • bad positioning,
  • panic movement,
  • and ignoring sound cues.
When multiple endermites are already out, of course things are messy. That’s not a design flaw; that’s the consequence of voluntarily fighting in the most cluttered and chaotic part of the map.

If someone charges into a pile of projectiles, particles, and explosions and gets hit, that’s not “unreactable.” That’s called bad timing.

It would be like walking into the middle of 6 gunfights in Valorant and saying, “Wow, I died instantly from a random angle! Bad game design!!”

This is the nature of mid-fights:

  • no visibility,
  • no spacing,
  • tight corridors,
  • stacked damage sources.
Blaming Pearl Bomb for chaos is like blaming rain for getting wet.

3. The “Less Than One Second Reaction Time” Argument Is AI-Generated Nonsense​

Berd repeats the phrase “less than one second to react” so many times it stops meaning anything. It’s used as a magical catch-all that supposedly proves bad design, but it's not backed by data, testing, or actual measured reaction windows.

It’s just:

  • a buzzword,
  • repeated endlessly,
  • copied directly from the crystal nerf announcement,
  • and applied to Pearl Bomb whether it fits or not.
This is exactly the kind of repetition AI-written posts produce—long, dramatic claims that sound meaningful but don’t survive contact with reality.

Unlike crystals, Pearl Bomb:

  • has a visible mob, not an invisible block entity,
  • glows,
  • makes loud, distinct sounds,
  • is mobile,
  • has a startup windup,
  • can be killed,
  • can be escaped because you only need to move,
  • can be baited,
  • can be shielded by terrain,
  • is inconsistent and unreliable,
  • does lower damage,
  • has random movement,
  • and is not an instant pop on placement.
Trying to force the same exact argument used for an entirely different module (crystals) onto Pearl Bomb is extremely shallow.

It’s “AI slop” because it completely ignores the mechanical differences in order to recycle someone else’s talking points.

4. “Unlucky” Is Not Evidence of Poor Design​

The entire foundation of the argument is that Pearl Bomb sometimes causes “unlucky moments.”

Of course it does.

So do:

  • Axe crits,
  • Bow shots from offscreen,
  • Knockback chains,
  • Traps,
  • Lag spikes,
  • Latency differences,
  • Fall damage,
  • Partner items,
  • Random crit particles blocking your view,
  • and literally every module in the game.
Minecraft PvP is a game of randomness, imperfect information, and chaotic interactions.

If the standard for removal is:


then we should delete half the game.

Unlucky ≠ unbalanced
Unlucky ≠ unfair
Unlucky ≠ bad design

Most good PvP systems—including vanilla—have randomness. Removing everything with randomness would make the game sterile.

5. Pearl Bomb Has Clear, Learnable Counterplay​

No matter how Berd frames it, the reality is:

  • You can hear Pearl Bomb clearly.
  • You can see it glowing even in a cluster.
  • You can outrun it with basic movement.
  • You can play terrain smartly to avoid multi-hits.
  • You can avoid mid if you don’t want to gamble.
  • You can eco Pearl Bombs and punish users when they run low.
  • You can bait explosions to punish overcommits.
  • You can hard pressure people who waste pearls offensively.
  • You can kill them before they detonate.
And in high-level fights, players are already doing these things. That’s why the people defending Pearl Bomb aren’t randomly exploding every five seconds.

If a player ignores all of these counterplays, runs straight through mid, and gets blasted by two or three Pearl Bombs placed earlier?
That’s not a design flaw. That’s a skill issue.

6. The “Everyone Dies Randomly” Argument Is Just False​

If Pearl Bomb really caused frequent unavoidable 6-heart nukes:

  • players would die constantly,
  • teamfights would collapse,
  • stats would reflect major swings,
  • top players would complain en masse,
  • and the community would be united behind a nerf.
None of that is happening.

Instead:

  • fights still last a long time,
  • players die to swords and axes, not Pearl Bomb,
  • the biggest teams aren’t winning because of it,
  • nobody has a positive explosion K/D,
  • and most players genuinely don’t have issues with it.
The only people complaining intensely are:

  • people fighting in the worst possible positions,
  • while ignoring the module entirely,
  • then claiming their deaths were “unreactable.”
That ≠ a balance issue.

7. Berd’s Post Reads Like AI Slop Because It Is AI Slop​

The writing patterns here are textbook AI:

  • repetitive phrasing (“constantly produces unreactable instant deaths” appears multiple times nearly verbatim),
  • circular arguments (repeating the same point with slightly different wording),
  • emotionally charged but vague statements,
  • overreliance on “in theory vs reality” language,
  • no real data,
  • no actual mechanical analysis,
  • recycled quotes,
  • dramatic exaggeration (“complete BS,” “unhealthy state,” “same as crystals”),
  • and no proposed alternative aside from generic “nerf damage and radius.”
It’s long, but it’s not thoughtful.
It’s wordy, but it’s not logical.
It’s dramatic, but it’s not factual.

It’s the kind of post you get when someone types “write me an argument why Pearl Bomb is broken” into GPT and copies the output wholesale.

Conclusion: Pearl Bomb Doesn’t Need To Be Removed or Gutted​

Pearl Bomb:

  • is not overpowered,
  • is not meta-defining,
  • is not causing win conditions,
  • is not consistently unreactable,
  • has clear counterplay,
  • has clear visual and audio cues,
  • is only dangerous in chaotic mid pushes,
  • and only kills players who position poorly.
Berd’s argument is overblown, repetitive, and built on the exact same structure AI tends to produce—emotional, circular, and lacking evidence.

Pearl Bomb isn’t the problem.
Bad positioning and panic gameplay are.

If the standard for “bad design” becomes “a module sometimes kills players who don’t pay attention,” then no module will survive.

And the server will be worse for it.

If you want, I can also turn this into:

  • A Discord-appropriate post
  • A shorter rebuttal
  • A more aggressive version
  • A more comedic version
  • A structured debate-style breakdown
  • Or a point-by-point dismantling of Berd’s original paragraphs
Just tell me the tone you want.
Click to expand...


View attachment junkofalling.mp4
 
+1 stupidest thing ever i swear it doesnt matter how far you are from it as long as you are in the range of it, it does the same amount of damage
 
i cant even defend it anymore i just got randomly 200 pumped by a pearl bomb 20 blocks away from me in mid wtf
 
please dont wait until the month is over to change this its genuinely horrible to play the server
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top