Type /register while in-game to register for a forums account.

[fa1c]

its a pg server we cant cuss but we can like children fairs cryptite

 

[Banks]

Because she admitted to repeatedly pleasuring herself to sexualized illustrations of very young girls, which is pedophilic behavior by definition. No normal person finds the illustrations she describes in the videos attractive and the target audience for the genre of hentai she describes in those messages is not a mystery

wats hentai

 

[xantlol]

Our stance on Kylaz comes down to looking at the situation in absolutes, like we do with any similar such case. Character, popularity, status, contributions to server recruiting, etc do not factor into how we considered her case.

In pure terms:
- What happened was over a year ago.
- There is no victim involved, therefore nobody to report an issue.
- We do not see any bar met for being an alleged danger to the community.

Given none of these apply, there is no action to take on our end.

let a pedo represent loka just what everyone wants to see

 

[Alcaili]

Hey guys im pretty sure it says that its only the drawings and because it says and I quote "Real life just breaks that illusion entirely and I have no reaction to it" so lets keep things nice and peaceful for you and me so lets all calm down a little
(✿◡‿◡)
~\(≧▽≦)/~
~\(≧▽≦)/~

 

[Banks]

This just feels like an insane and unjustifiable decision to me. The precedent it sets is extremely bad.
How long ago something happens has little relevance in an extreme situation like this one IMO, if anything the fact this was as recent as a year ago is what makes it extremely alarming. The evidence here is not in dispute whatsoever, the source of the evidence is Kylaz herself and we only have access to it because it (successfully) attempts to show that she had genuine concern about her urges and that she sought out help, and thats good for her and all but I really cannot comprehend why you would ever let someone with these urges remain on the server when the playerbase is full of kids. There was no victim involved so why not take the precautionary measures necessary to ensure this remains the case? When is the bar for being a danger to the community met? Is it met in the scenario where someone gets taken advantage of or harmed? Whats the point in allowing that to be a possibility in the first place?

i dont think its fair to punish sm1 because you think they might commit a harmful act in the future

 

[Melon]

i dont think its fair to punish sm1 because you think they might commit a harmful act in the future

i actually think it might be fair to keep someone with a sexual attraction to children away from children

 

[DevvyVR]

i dont think its fair to punish sm1 because you think they might commit a harmful act in the future

if you are supporting kylaz you gotta be sick in the head shes literally a pedophile and needs help

 

[DevvyVR]

i actually think it might be fair to keep someone with a sexual attraction to children away from children

bare minimum man

 

[DevvyVR]

wait so if I admit to pleasuring myself to anime depictions of underage children, i wont get banned off of Loka because "there wasn't a victim"????

what is happening bro

 

[Banks]

i actually think it might be fair to keep someone with a sexual attraction to children away from children

she likes minors?

 

[berdb]

wait so if I admit to pleasuring myself to anime depictions of underage children, i wont get banned off of Loka because "there wasn't a victim"????

what is happening bro

yeah idk bro these are like #1 pedophile arguements ive heard on stoneworks every time someone got exposed for liking anime kids theyd go "theres no victim" "its just illustrations" "theres no danger to the community" but in the end stoneworks would ban them but im literally seeing these exact same arguements being posted by cryptite LOL

 

[fa1c]

yeah idk bro these are like #1 pedophile arguements ive heard on stoneworks every time someone got exposed for liking anime kids theyd go "theres no victim" "its just illustrations" "theres no danger to the community" but in the end stoneworks would ban them but im literally seeing these exact same arguements being posted by cryptite LOL

its insane this classifies as a pg server but someone who shows clear attraction to children is allowed to be a slicer let alone a community rep. Just because there is no victim doesnt mean this person doesnt pose a threat to children on this “pg” server, keep up the good work cryptite

 

[mimo4]

i dont think its fair to punish sm1 because you think they might commit a harmful act in the future

does playing dumb get boring

 

[shharpp]

can we add age verification so that only people 18+ can play loka? then there would be no harm in having an incredibly weird interest in “weird anime characters who coincidentally look like little children” since no one would be under age

 

[SHARKMONO]

we have lost the plot

 

[Click1x]

loka revolution lets overthrow cryptite and put me in charge

 

[Click1x]

 

[ArakRecruit67]

It almost always is though. Players aren't dumb and a lot of players muted/banned for harassment already do put it together. If there's any chance that providing context to a punishment will give clues as to who "got them in trouble in the first place" then it's a literal nonstarter and betrays the entire harassment handling system.

If people who have had way worse things done/said to them (IN REAL LIFE)and are still forced to testify/make it known that they're the ones who, in loka terms, "reported" someone, why can't people in a block game do the same thing?

 

[mimo4]

View attachment 15529
If people who have had way worse things done/said to them (IN REAL LIFE)and are still forced to testify/make it known that they're the ones who, in loka terms, "reported" someone, why can't people in a block game do the same thing?View attachment 15530

This comparison is a bit flawed since IRL the law is all encompassing and law enforcement can (often relatively easily) ensure the safety of the victim during a formal trial. Loka rules are not all encompassing and Loka staff do not have that same level of control, if someone doxxes or harasses etc. and their victim gets them banned and somehow that person (if they have done it to multiple people) is not sure who got them banned, it is reasonable for Loka staff to not give that information because Loka staff can only ban on Loka and the Loka discord and they cant do anything about harassment or doxxing etc. that continues outside of it, so they might put be putting the victim at risk of more targeted harassment that they would have no power to stop.

But I do think this should be reserved for more extreme situations and someone who said something dumb in chat or whatever and got muted for it should be told what they said

 

[DevvyVR]

This comparison is a bit flawed since IRL the law is all encompassing and law enforcement can (often relatively easily) ensure the safety of the victim during a formal trial. Loka rules are not all encompassing and Loka staff do not have that same level of control, if someone doxxes or harasses etc. and their victim gets them banned and somehow that person (if they have done it to multiple people) is not sure who got them banned, it is reasonable for Loka staff to not give that information because Loka staff can only ban on Loka and the Loka discord and they cant do anything about harassment or doxxing etc. that continues outside of it, so they might put be putting the victim at risk of more targeted harassment that they would have no power to stop.

But I do think this should be reserved for more extreme situations and someone who said something dumb in chat or whatever and got muted for it should be told what they said

It's also worth mentioning that real-life law ≠ loka rules.
Loka is a private Minecraft server and does not serve any government entity.

But still agree with the last bit of what Mimo said