mongoldeportes
New Member
IGN: tomzl
Reason: Bypassing SS / Hacking
I am writing this appeal to dispute my ban issued on May 28th, 2026, for the reason "Bypassing SS / Hacking".
I was requested for a screenshare due to suspicions of cheating. From the very beginning, I accepted the review and cooperated with the staff member in charge. Throughout the entire SS, I answered the questions asked of me and followed every instruction given to me.
During the review, my mods, texture folders, game files, and different locations on my computer were inspected to verify the presence of illegal modifications or third-party software. Tools such as Ocean, Everything, and JournalTrace were also used to analyze my system.
Throughout the entire review, no cheats, autoclickers, injections, illegal modifications, or any other files related to hacks were found.
I would like to make it clear that I genuinely did not know those services were disabled, nor did I know the specific function they performed. At no point did I disable them with the intention of gaining an advantage in Minecraft or bypassing a screenshare.
To this day, I believe it is possible that this was the result of some system optimization done in the past through Windows configurations or optimization tools, something fairly common among players seeking to improve their computer's overall performance.
I was also never informed during the review about what specific advantage these disabled services provided within the game. Personally, I never noticed any difference in my gameplay experience, nor did I know this could be considered a violation.
The staff member kindly responded that they could not do so and that it depended on me to make that change. I understood their position, although I was surprised that this resulted in a permanent ban, especially considering that no illegal software or evidence of cheats was found during the entire review.
Despite a language barrier, as the review was conducted mainly in English, communication was maintained through translation tools. At all times, I attempted to cooperate, answer questions, and facilitate the process.
Since being punished, I have already re-enabled the services that were pointed out during the screenshare.
I have always tried to maintain good conduct within the server, and I believe my cooperation during the screenshare demonstrates that I had no intention of hiding information or obstructing the review.
Additionally, if my intention had been to bypass the screenshare process, I would not have voluntarily cooperated throughout the entire review, allowed full access to the requested files, and answered every question asked by the staff member.
I fully understand that the staff team must take measures to protect the integrity of the server, but I believe that a permanent ban due to Windows services that I was unaware were disabled is excessive, especially when no evidence of cheats, modified clients, or illegal programs was found throughout the investigation.
Therefore, I respectfully request that my case be reconsidered and that the possibility of removing or reducing the imposed punishment be evaluated.
Thank you very much for your time and consideration.
This appeal was translated using a translator, so I apologize for any wording mistakes.
tomzl 
Reason: Bypassing SS / Hacking
Introduction
Hello staff and LokaMC players.I am writing this appeal to dispute my ban issued on May 28th, 2026, for the reason "Bypassing SS / Hacking".
I was requested for a screenshare due to suspicions of cheating. From the very beginning, I accepted the review and cooperated with the staff member in charge. Throughout the entire SS, I answered the questions asked of me and followed every instruction given to me.
During the review, my mods, texture folders, game files, and different locations on my computer were inspected to verify the presence of illegal modifications or third-party software. Tools such as Ocean, Everything, and JournalTrace were also used to analyze my system.
Throughout the entire review, no cheats, autoclickers, injections, illegal modifications, or any other files related to hacks were found.
Explanation
The situation that led to my ban occurred when Ocean detected that I had certain Windows services disabled.I would like to make it clear that I genuinely did not know those services were disabled, nor did I know the specific function they performed. At no point did I disable them with the intention of gaining an advantage in Minecraft or bypassing a screenshare.
To this day, I believe it is possible that this was the result of some system optimization done in the past through Windows configurations or optimization tools, something fairly common among players seeking to improve their computer's overall performance.
I was also never informed during the review about what specific advantage these disabled services provided within the game. Personally, I never noticed any difference in my gameplay experience, nor did I know this could be considered a violation.
During the Screenshare
When I was informed that the services were disabled, my immediate reaction was to ask the staff member if they could help me enable them again.The staff member kindly responded that they could not do so and that it depended on me to make that change. I understood their position, although I was surprised that this resulted in a permanent ban, especially considering that no illegal software or evidence of cheats was found during the entire review.
Despite a language barrier, as the review was conducted mainly in English, communication was maintained through translation tools. At all times, I attempted to cooperate, answer questions, and facilitate the process.
Since being punished, I have already re-enabled the services that were pointed out during the screenshare.
Why I Am Requesting Reconsideration
I have been playing on LokaMC for approximately five to six months, and during that time I have not received any previous punishments.I have always tried to maintain good conduct within the server, and I believe my cooperation during the screenshare demonstrates that I had no intention of hiding information or obstructing the review.
Additionally, if my intention had been to bypass the screenshare process, I would not have voluntarily cooperated throughout the entire review, allowed full access to the requested files, and answered every question asked by the staff member.
I fully understand that the staff team must take measures to protect the integrity of the server, but I believe that a permanent ban due to Windows services that I was unaware were disabled is excessive, especially when no evidence of cheats, modified clients, or illegal programs was found throughout the investigation.
Therefore, I respectfully request that my case be reconsidered and that the possibility of removing or reducing the imposed punishment be evaluated.
Thank you very much for your time and consideration.
This appeal was translated using a translator, so I apologize for any wording mistakes.
tomzl 
, loka doesnt make sense sometimes
