Type /register while in-game to register for a forums account.

[Broquu]

Hi me here

I Think there should be a new hierarchy regarding towns

-Owner
-Co-Owner
-Sub-owner
-Lord
-lvl 3
-lvl 2
-lvl 1

Co-owner would have some more perms then Sub-owner
Co-Owners can add/remove sub-owners.
Co-owners like the full owner can report for town betrayle.
CO-owners like the full owner are immune to town betrayle.
Co-owners should be able to /town a leave (subowners shouldn't
Co-owners should be able to invite/remove towns to the alliance (subowners shouldn't)
Co-Owners should be able to change vuln (subowners shouldn't)


Ofcourse the last sounds silly, but its so full owners wont add everyone as co-owner instead of subowner, and only trusted people become co-owner.
Having co-owners makes it easier for people that own a town together, like me and obuth for example we bought a town and we decided that obuth should own it, but i feel like to make it easier to do this. co-owner would be a great addition!

And with this should come a town a perm (invite/remove towns)


Broquu out

 

[Broquu]

I'd rather just allow town owners to change the permissions of what subowners could do rather than add some explicit new rank that only one extra player can have. That way you can have as many or as little subowners as you want with some granularity over what they can do.

Its more that i think there should be 2 people above all the subowners
1 fullowner
1 co-owner
Ofcourse I understand that the town betrayle rule i added in would be too confusing to deal with but i.m.o. all the other's are reasonable
Like you cant give subowners the perms to remove subowner

Lets say there is a situation
I am online obuth isnt another subowner is just spawn killing people in town wich will make them leave i should be able to demote him and lock him up or something so he will stop
Or someone is stealing stuff from rooms instead of letting this happen a co_owner could stop it before we need to take further action of a report since who wants to get players banned (ofcourse it would be irrisponsable from the owner to add such subowner)

 

[obuth]

Its more that i think there should be 2 people above all the subowners
1 fullowner
1 co-owner
Ofcourse I understand that the town betrayle rule i added in would be too confusing to deal with but i.m.o. all the other's are reasonable
Like you cant give subowners the perms to remove subowner

Lets say there is a situation
I am online obuth isnt another subowner is just spawn killing people in town wich will make them leave i should be able to demote him and lock him up or something so he will stop
Or someone is stealing stuff from rooms instead of letting this happen a co_owner could stop it before we need to take further action of a report since who wants to get players banned (ofcourse it would be irrisponsable from the owner to add such subowner)

If I'm correct, what Cryptite said already does that.
Full-owners being able to give sub-owners permissions over the commands they can do, would cut out the need for another rank. If, that includes giving sub-owners permissions that currently only full-owners have.

 

[Perds_]

+1

 

[Wxndernut]

-1

 

[Luquinhas_]

+1 usseful and weall need a co-owner, ALWAYS!