Type /register while in-game to register for a forums account.

[__Ske__]

-1

"Left Riverside cause six was more active"

Most bullshit story in loka history xd, leaving one of the most active towns for a slum that warped 5 for most of its history and warps 15 crusalis recruits now

riverside = slums, makes perfect sense (i have had people who moved from riverside cuz they couldnt stand being there, also they have a bunch of super annoying ppl so im not suprised that someone was looking for a better option)

Also why u giving lvl4 in town to allegedly completerly random noob who just joined loka? Too much shit doesnt add up lol

some towns are too lazy to set up perms for every level so they give lvl 4 to everyone (me)

 

[Cillia_1]

"riverside = slums" holy cope lmao, looks better than most towns and has 30+ actives, certainly looks better than six and is more active, literally just saying shit

 

[Cillia_1]

the whole story makes 0 sense and its a lot more believable that theyre all friends and knew it all

 

[__Ske__]

"riverside = slums" holy cope lmao, looks better than most towns and has 30+ actives, certainly looks better than six and is more active, literally just saying shit

the build is somewhat decent i wont deny that, but a town that often is on 0 pearls and pots (ik the six sometimes also struggled with pots but a fresh recruit wouldnt know that), and often refuses to provide rooms for recruits can be considered slums

 

[Cillia_1]

i was told like a week ago (around the time the alt played) riverside has like 10 or 15k hp pots. and like, i wouldnt even care if some actual recruit thought six is better than riverside, yea whatever recruits can be wrong, but it was an established player alting who obviously joined six cause its his friends town lol, however in his post falsedamage was saying "The next day, I realized the town wasn't very active and I wanted more. I asked in alliance chat if there were better towns to join in the alliance and I was invited to The Six.". Falsedamage joined the six with an alt cause its his friends town, be fr

 

[Cillia_1]

i think its very clear he was just pretending to be a noob in alliance chat for shits and giggles and wanted to join the six from the start, i dont think anything he said in ally chat is a valid alibi lol

 

[Cillia_1]

and to all the people saying "well he wasnt banned so alting is okay"

Loka has tons of server mechanics which can only work fairly if its 1 guy 1 account. stuff like locking for alliance, ri resetting every 3 days, orbs for daily voting and quests, etc. So even if ur not ban evading alting gives u lots of advantages, u can get a lot more shards and orbs -> lores with alts, one doesnt have to hack in ranked for alting to be unfair advantage lol

 

[Shrubbery]

i think its just a huge giant massive coincidence he joined his close friends town and was added to his room nothing suspicious at all

 

[__Ske__]

and to all the people saying "well he wasnt banned so alting is okay"

Loka has tons of server mechanics which can only work fairly if its 1 guy 1 account. stuff like locking for alliance, ri resetting every 3 days, orbs for daily voting and quests, etc. So even if ur not ban evading alting gives u lots of advantages, u can get a lot more shards and orbs -> lores with alts, one doesnt have to hack in ranked for alting to be unfair advantage lol

falsedamaged - last online 2 months ago, so he wasnt taking advantage of any of that
imo ofc alting is not okay, but at the same time i dont belive that enough harm was done for a perm, there were people tempbanned for xray (iirc prusso was LOL), and xraying in any ammout causes more harm then a guy whos trying to have a fresh start, again he wasnt locked, banned, muted, he wasnt abusing ris or daily blocks, or quest rewards, or voting, or anything, so in my humble opinion, permban for all of them is still a bit too much in case they are found innocent. Just not enough harm done to permanently exclude them from the community

 

[Cillia_1]

falsedamaged - last online 2 months ago, so he wasnt taking advantage of any of that
imo ofc alting is not okay, but at the same time i dont belive that enough harm was done for a perm, there were people tempbanned for xray (iirc prusso was LOL), and xraying in any ammout causes more harm then a guy whos trying to have a fresh start, again he wasnt locked, banned, muted, he wasnt abusing ris or daily blocks, or quest rewards, or voting, or anything, so in my humble opinion, permban for all of them is still a bit too much in case they are found innocent. Just not enough harm done to permanently exclude them from the community

if someone logs on loka with a hacked client, never uses it, then gets ss'ed and banned, would "but i never actually used hacks for my advantage, so it shouldnt be perma" be a valid argument?

 

[Cillia_1]

im being 100% deadass i wouldve prob been leaning to think that gllory is innocent if not for the falsedamaged thread earlier lmao, like what kind of appeal was that when the guy who you totally didnt help ban evade makes an appeal for u???

 

[__Ske__]

if someone logs on loka with a hacked client, never uses it, then gets ss'ed and banned, would "but i never actually used hacks for my advantage, so it shouldnt be perma" be a valid argument?

useless argument, cuz if someone gets ssed it means that they were suspected of cheating, and having cheats injected into your game proves that you were cheating

 

[__Ske__]

im being 100% deadass i wouldve prob been leaning to think that gllory is innocent if not for the falsedamaged thread earlier lmao, like what kind of appeal was that when the guy who you totally didnt help ban evade makes an appeal for u???

yea well i guess thats down to opinion and interpretation, also both of us are bias to some degree, you hate them, and im friends with them

i try my best to look at the available proof and form my opinion based on that, if admins reveal some shocking chat logs that prove that they knew, then fair enough keep them locked up i guess, but so far we havent seen any proof that would point towards them knowing, mostly assumptions like "well they were friends so they had to know", which makes sense but its not valid proof

 

[Cillia_1]

thats not the point of this hypothetical but whetever, u can say that they screenshared their client somewhere accidentally and had nothing on

 

[rolyy]

Paragon slobs talking the talk as per usual

 

[rolyy]

Innocent until proven guilty #freeup

 

[Cillia_1]

yea well i guess thats down to opinion and interpretation, also both of us are bias to some degree, you hate them, and im friends with them

i try my best to look at the available proof and form my opinion based on that, if admins reveal some shocking chat logs that prove that they knew, then fair enough keep them locked up i guess, but so far we havent seen anything that would point towards them knowing

everyone on every loka forum thread is biased cause why would anyone interact with appeal of ppl they never heard about unless its something giga blatant. im just pointing out plotholes in falsedamaged story cause in a situation where nothing can be definitively proven or disproven, i think those things matter, and their weight is at least the same as alliance chat logs

 

[Cillia_1]

Paragon slobs talking the talk as per usual

cant resist egoing even on loka forums

 

[Cillia_1]

also yea admins dont make evidence public, thats how every minecraft server works, sucks if you're innocent, but otherwise itd be a lot easier for ppl to break rules if every time someone is banned admins post "here's exactly how we figured out this guy was breaking rules"

 

[__Ske__]

also yea admins dont make evidence public, thats how every minecraft server works, sucks if you're innocent, but otherwise itd be a lot easier for ppl to break rules if every time someone is banned admins post "here's exactly how we figured out this guy was breaking rules"

thats partially correct, however in this case the evidence is most likely just chat logs, here is what i said in a conversation with a staff member when we were discussing it (too lazy to type it again) (i covered him up cuz idk if he wants me sharing our little convo):