Welcome to our Forums!

Type /register while in-game to register for a forum account.

Harassment on the Server

FroggyFruit1357

Well-Known Member
With all the I agrees aside, I think that the administration team handled the situation correctly at the moment. If town chat isn't moderated, then why should another form of town chat be? I think that we should talk as a community (state of the server pt.2) about these rules that obviously need updating before some people result in leaving the server permanently.
 

Curlyy

Member
Slicer
Jib your response to the "I agree" thing is plain wrong. You cant chalk up people standing up for themselves as a "mindless mob mentality", frankly I find it kinda insulting the way you responded. If people dont stand up for themselves, and especially if they dont
stand with their friends then the world would be a less open place and somewhere that I definitely wouldnt want to live in (see -North Korea or other dictatorships where opinions are silenced that you definitely wouldnt want to live under). All the I agree thing is a humorous way to show how many people find this situation was handled poorly.
 

Teyuh

Active Member
Slicer
With all the I agrees aside, I think that the administration team handled the situation correctly at the moment. If town chat isn't moderated, then why should another form of town chat be? I think that we should talk as a community (state of the server pt.2) about these rules that obviously need updating before some people result in leaving the server permanently.
I do agree with what u have said but there 30 mins is up. they can have fun with a dead server <3
 

FroggyFruit1357

Well-Known Member
Jib your response to the "I agree" thing is plain wrong. You cant chalk up people standing up for themselves as a "mindless mob mentality", frankly I find it kinda insulting the way you responded. If people dont stand up for themselves, and especially if they dont
stand with their friends then the world would be a less open place and somewhere that I definitely wouldnt want to live in (see -North Korea or other dictatorships where opinions are silenced that you definitely wouldnt want to live under). All the I agree thing is a humorous way to show how many people find this situation was handled poorly.
Curlyy, I agree with that
 

jibblypop

Well-Known Member
Slicer
Jib your response to the "I agree" thing is plain wrong. You cant chalk up people standing up for themselves as a "mindless mob mentality", frankly I find it kinda insulting the way you responded. If people dont stand up for themselves, and especially if they dont
stand with their friends then the world would be a less open place and somewhere that I definitely wouldnt want to live in (see -North Korea or other dictatorships where opinions are silenced that you definitely wouldnt want to live under). All the I agree thing is a humorous way to show how many people find this situation was handled poorly.
1564437685343.png
 

Monkss

Member
Slicer
Genuinely i believe this is an unproffesional response to this situation.
What the signs said was wrong yes, but they were not public and even within the town itself
were hidden and not for the world to see. In loka its apparent that town chat and towns are fair game
so to suddenly go back on this rule definitely doesnt seem like the appropriate choice of actions.
Had the content of the signs been released in public chat or displayed within a capital hall in spawn then by all
means the punishment would've been necessary. But to ban four players, without warning is seriously an unwise decision
morally and from the perspective of a server owner. It damages reputation, the server's playerbase and the atmosphere of the
server as a whole.
You make it clear in the post that this is harrasment. It's not. To harass someone is to go out of you way is to induce
pressure, intimidate, or communicate attacks to a person in whatever manner that may be. These messages, although disgusting,
were private and by no means were harrasment despite how wrong the content may have been.
The signs were by no means serious and were just a result of their (maybe not very good) sense of humour.
Ideally staff should've taken measures to warn the players, maybe telling them to remove the signs. But considering that nothing
was actually said to the victims in question, to ban without warning seems immature to say the least.
Im sorry that my first post on this forum has to be a negative one, but it disappoints me to no end how staff have dealt with this.


*Sorry for horrible layout
agreed!
 
Back
Top