Suggestion Cap to conquest fights (all). (HOT TAKE)

[Lampp_]

@Lurnn Sorry im late, here's the real reason they don't want this done, dont let them distract you from the truth

And the reason you want this is because you have better players cryptite don’t let them distract you from the truth...

 

[Lurnn]

This photo is to blurry please take it again

I gotchu bro..

 

[Lurnn]

And the reason you want this is because you have better players cryptite don’t let them distract you from the truth...

Not that it matters but, at this moment your average player is actually better than ours, it's not relevant just thought it worth noting, yes we have BETTER players, but your average is higher so yup

 

[lilfros]

Loka Forums

Official forums for the popular Loka Minecraft Server

lokamc.com

 

[TheFreshLemon]

sure the fights aren't enjoyable. But quite honestly I don't care that much- I think it sucks for newer players who have no real impression on what a real fun loka fight is, but for me I always fight through laggy fights etc whatever I don't care- So truthfully I couldn't care less.

Objective player talk

I gotchu bro..

that's even worse bruh. Also what's wrong with the ss it's just people speaking fax

 

[Lurnn]

Objective player talk

that's even worse bruh. Also what's wrong with the ss it's just people speaking fax

oh idc theres a reason i ignored the ss i just made it worse for memes lawl

 

[Cryptite]

These posts do come up after big fights, but they more frequently come up after big fights that lag a bunch. It's of course why we're sharding and as everyone knows, sharding is taking precedence over almost all other work (that I'm doing anyway). As was mentioned earlier, we do have some plans for extra Conquest Fight objectives that help make the fight at least not about being at either the tgen/inhib.

But first and foremost, if the big fights were less laggy, more people could get kills and everyone could rule out server tps as a reason why they won/lost. Once that's out, we can reevaluate.

 

[nerdcat]

I gotchu bro..

NOT EVEN BETTER SMH

 

[Lurnn]

just to clarify i dont think bits is losing because of lag

it is simply because our team is worse.

 

[Sparky___]

just to clarify i dont think bits is losing because of lag

it is simply because our team is worse.

The real hot take of this thread.

 

[Lurnn]

The real hot take of this thread.

ahah ITS TRUE THO

 

[SilentStormSix]

ORRRRRRR HEAR ME OUT. the defending/ offending side gets to CHOOSE how many people fight during that fight on both sides (whether it be min 64 people and can choose all the way to unlimited players) !!!!!!

what

 

[Asynchronized]

what

what

 

[Lurnn]

what

what

 

[Lampp_]

what

what

 

[Z3K33]

@Lurnn these 2 convinced and showed me why this would be a bad idea

Funny on how one of them are yours

 

[TheFreshLemon]

just to clarify i dont think bits is losing because of lag

it is simply because our team is worse.

SCREENSHOT THIS OMG OMG CLIP IT CLIP IT LURNN SAID RP BETTER THEN BITS OML OMG AINT NO WAY

 

[nerdcat]

SCREENSHOT THIS OMG OMG CLIP IT CLIP IT LURNN SAID RP BETTER THEN BITS OML OMG AINT NO WAY

RP TAKEOVER

 

[jakeman5]

SCREENSHOT THIS OMG OMG CLIP IT CLIP IT LURNN SAID RP BETTER THEN BITS OML OMG AINT NO WAY

Without lag we still get outnumbered by 20 lololol. BITS DOWN. So in response I have recruited a whole crystal server. This month is about to get interesting.

 

[Lurnn]

Without lag we still get outnumbered by 20 lololol. BITS DOWN. So in response I have recruited a whole crystal server. This month is about to get interesting.

we lost even fights.