"It's irrelevant, happened ages ago... and doesn't change this situation in any way."check eldritch bot. was there a fight Wolf Force VS Best in the West?
Edit: https://eldritchbot.com/fight?id=ry8YED9eD yeah....
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
"It's irrelevant, happened ages ago... and doesn't change this situation in any way."check eldritch bot. was there a fight Wolf Force VS Best in the West?
i said Wolf Force vos BITW not BITW vs Wolf Force. the only reason i said sure was to delay the process so we could place a neutral and get world cap"It's irrelevant, happened ages ago... and doesn't change this situation in any way."
Edit: https://eldritchbot.com/fight?id=ry8YED9eD yeah....
No offense here but for this will be my third time saying it and your seeming like a broken record, but please put on reading glasses and read it this timei said Wolf Force vos BITW not BITW vs Wolf Force. the only reason i said sure was to delay the process so we could place a neutral and get world cap
We were simply defending our tile so this is not a win trade (Agreed on by two sides) but more of a place with the intent to lose if that.
This goes back on to the actual definition of win trading. Does it include a situation like this, where you place on someone (without them knowing), and then lose because a limited number of people showed up- and allegedly do this to make them gain strength without their own knowledge? Can you elevate someone's strength on purpose without their knowledge because you would rather them have the most strength? The definition needs to be rethought to either include this, or not include this.
Below is a list of our rules. Note that admins do not necessarily judge these rules to the letter, and that attempting to skirt the rules may still end up in a punishment. Some of these rules are left intentionally vague, others can be clearly defined. In any case, consider these a set of guidelines rather than a set-in-stone list of precise rulings.
11. Misc
11.4. Win trading in conquest is not allowed (Attacking 'friends' with the intent to lose to feed another town Strength).
the issue is. the intent was to win so i don’t see why I was banned. More specifically when I did t want to placePoint of fact, the win trading rule is very explicit about this exact situation.
you saying the intent was to win doesn't make it so, lmao... if you had intent to win you would have pinged, and even you know that.the issue is. the intent was to win so i don’t see why I was banned. More specifically when I did t want to place
we did ping lol we just delete our fight pings chats light wolf force and any normal allianceyou saying the intent was to win doesn't make it so, lmao... if you had intent to win you would have pinged, and even you know that.
You expect me, or anyone to believe that you pinged over 40 active members, (the amount you have) and that 5 showed, are you insane lmao....we did ping lol we just delete our fight pings chats light wolf force and any normal alliance
I mean, this was all voted on the day before (as you can see in the image posted)You expect me, or anyone to believe that you pinged over 40 active members, (the amount you have) and that 5 showed, are you insane lmao....
Yet you can pull 20 on defense???
This is laughable.
This literally proves nothingI mean, this was all voted on the day before (as you can see in the image posted)
literally shows us talking about placing lol, never anything about us losing on purpose.This literally proves nothing
Alright so with this logicliterally shows us talking about placing lol, never anything about us losing on purpose.
look at time stampsAlright so with this logic
I can go place on (for example) wolf force rn
Say in a text channel "im placing on wolf force"
Warp alone, sadly lose.... and because I said im placing and didnt say im win trading, that means I am not.
(Believe it or not it doesn't!)
Literally doesn't matter... that's not a ping and by the looks of it that chat isn't exactly activelook at time stamps
this was the first attack lol. I didn't place lol. UghBraces did. n honestly more like ur exposing lemon lol. not me. also on that note reason we dm instead of ping was cuz of tabither lolView attachment 1793View attachment 1794View attachment 1795View attachment 1796
View attachment 1797
View attachment 1798
There. Let's cut the crap and put this thread to rest. Diego I'm sorry that I had to come out with what actually happened, but from now on I make no exceptions for this kind of crap. "I'll place but not going to show or ping." This along with trying to hide evidence should put this thread to bed.
It shows the general attitude that leadership had going into the fights. Everyone screwed up in these past few days. Thanks. Can't wait to get my roles removed for exposing this absolute garbage. And for the record, lemon did suggest you place and make a ping, which is still better than your original suggestion.this was the first attack lol. I didn't place lol. UghBraces did. n honestly more like ur exposing lemon lol. not me
At this point we need a thread to expose the crap that goes on these days with the mega-alliances. Is Wolf Force losing world cap the biggest calculated loss ever? Did Jammin legitimately want to win trade? Like, come on. And on the spies thing. For gods sake fix itwhy remove your roles lol idc enough to. just glad im not the only one going under the bus lol. I didn't even wanna place lol. show the messages under the lufer ones lol
lets betray Teasun? NOT LIKE silentstormseven can beat us bothAt this point we need a thread to expose the crap that goes on these days with the mega-alliances. Is Wolf Force losing world cap the biggest calculated loss ever? Did Jammin legitimately want to win trade? Like, come on. And on the spies thing. For gods sake fix it