I don't really see a need to even bother with this as pretty much every mod will be disabled and there isn't any real benefit to allowing it if this is the case.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Apart from FPS which most people needI don't really see a need to even bother with this as pretty much every mod will be disabled and there isn't any real benefit to allowing it if this is the case.
Use optifine or sodium, they do pretty much everything lunar does.Apart from FPS which most people need
Both of which has less FPS then lunar due to the fact their both still configured to java of minecraft itself while lunar is a different type of java (i believe)Use optifine or sodium, they do pretty much everything lunar does.
The reason to bother is that setting up a new launcher might discourage someone from playing on Loka in the first place. If this is easy to set up and allows more players to play on their favorite launchers I don't see the problem with doing this.I don't really see a need to even bother with this as pretty much every mod will be disabled and there isn't any real benefit to allowing it if this is the case.
Pretty sure that was only found on 1.12(could be wrong)The literal reason we have Lunar fully disabled is because it has inherent anti-knockback (intentional or otherwise) built in. Until this is proven to have been resolved lately (which doesn't thus far seem to be the case), Loka will continue to block players joining with it.
+5Lunar Client is fully blocked currently using the Lunar API, however many people likely have to switch from Lunar to Optifine to even log on to Loka, not to mention the fact that not being able to join on Lunar Client could possibly make people not want to play. You can use the Lunar API to disable specific mods.
This is the website for the Lunar Client API, which allows you to download this and implement this feature. You can disable any of the disallowed mods on Loka with this, I will list these below.GitHub - LunarClient/BukkitAPI: Bukkit API for interacting with Lunar Client
Bukkit API for interacting with Lunar Client. Contribute to LunarClient/BukkitAPI development by creating an account on GitHub.github.com
All of these are rough, however if this was to be added this would have to be checked obviously.
this is from cubecraft, interesting stuff, i also heard about labymod having hidden features according to other server ownersThe literal reason we have Lunar fully disabled is because it has inherent anti-knockback (intentional or otherwise) built in. Until this is proven to have been resolved lately (which doesn't thus far seem to be the case), Loka will continue to block players joining with it.
-1 loka is fine the way it is without flashy pvp client
for both of these points, you're limiting the incoming players by requiring for them to abide by the rules, you need to stay on a different client. A big population of the 1.9 pvp community uses lunar and besides what crypt said below, there's no reason not to add it.I don't really see a need to even bother with this as pretty much every mod will be disabled and there isn't any real benefit to allowing it if this is the case.
The literal reason we have Lunar fully disabled is because it has inherent anti-knockback (intentional or otherwise) built in. Until this is proven to have been resolved lately (which doesn't thus far seem to be the case), Loka will continue to block players joining with it.
This is a very good point and my mind has been changed; so long as there is no KB funkiness i say add it backfor both of these points, you're limiting the incoming players by requiring for them to abide by the rules, you need to stay on a different client. A big population of the 1.9 pvp community uses lunar and besides what crypt said below, there's no reason not to add it.
For the testing of KB funkiness I will do a test tommorow(recorded) and attach it to this thread, if I'm proven wrong about the kb so be it.This is a very good point and my mind has been changed; so long as there is no KB funkiness i say add it back